摘要犯罪构成理论是刑法的核心问题，我国的犯罪构成理论继承于前苏联，四个要件彼此等价，呈现平面型；而大陆法系受到早期自然科学zhuyi和新康德zhuyi的影响，区分三个阶层，各阶层之间具有逻辑顺序；英美法系犯罪构成在实践的基础上产生，由两个阶层对合而成。在理论和实务上我国犯罪构成虽然存在诸多弊端，但大陆法系与英美法系同样具有各自的缺陷，因此不能盲目求同。应当立足于“宽严相济的刑事政策”，采取客观归责原则，在三阶层的基础上破除犯罪论与刑罚论的界限，重新建构起应罚性与需罚性两大层次，建立起适合我国国情的犯罪构成体系。67217
毕 业 论 文 外 文 摘 要
Title Comparative Study of the Theory Crime Constitution
Abstract
The crime constitution theory is the core of the criminal law,and our crime constitution theory inherited from the former Soviet Union,whose four elements are equivalent,belongs to the planar structure.However,the Civil Law is effected by the early science and the new Kantianism,with three stratum and ordered by the logic. In the UK-US there are two arrangements due based on the court practice.Although there are many disadvantages either in the theory or the practice in our country’s crime constitution theory,the UK-US and the Civil Law also have troubles,so cannot blindly seeking.The suggestion is that based on the criminal policy of “tempering justice with mercy”,Taking the objective imputation principle.On the basis of Stratum style break the boundaries of crime theory and penalty theory, and construct two layers that “should be fined” and “need be fined”,to establish the crime constitution system suitable for China's national conditions.
Keywords Crime constitution system Comparative study Criminal policy
目 次
1 引言 1
2 我国犯罪构成理论概述 2
2.1 犯罪构成的概念 2
2.2 我国犯罪构成理论的构成要件 2
2.3 我国犯罪构成理论的特点 3
3 国外犯罪构成理论概述 4
3.1 英美法系的犯罪构成理论概述 4
3.2 大陆法系国家的犯罪构成理论 5
4 犯罪构成理论之比较 7
4.1 理论基础的差异 7
4.2 构成要件的差异 10
4.3 对司法实践影响的差异 14
5 完善我国犯罪构成的建议 17
5.1 犯罪客体的去除 17
5.2 规范的违反与实质的违法性构成刑事不法 19
5.3 客观归责原则的引用 20
5.4 刑事政策上的应罚性与需罚性体系的建立 22
结 论 犯罪构成理论比较研究:http://www.youerw.com/faxue/lunwen_75338.html